Question detail

GX22: In snail shell polymorphism, which design best tests Explain stabilising, directional and disruptive selection.?

Try the question, check the answer, then read the explanation to understand the curriculum point.

At a glance

MCQ

Type

practice

Style

Topic

Genetics and ecosystems official content

Question

  1. A. GX22: Use the snail shell polymorphism. Measure banded-shell counts. Change predator-abundance index; record the dependent variable from the data table; hold shell key blind check constant. Use random/systematic sampling, representative sample size and bias check. Compare observed and expected values; use critical value, significance and null hypothesis. Correlation means association; correlation does not prove causation. Keep locus-variant evidence separate from allele-frequency model evidence and selection evidence. Evaluate validity, reliability, limitation, conclusion and improvement.
  2. B. GX22: Use casual observations of snail shell polymorphism; omit expected values and ignore sample size. Evaluate validity, reliability, limitation, conclusion and improvement.
  3. C. GX22: Change predator-abundance index and shell key blind check together, then claim correlation proves causation. Evaluate validity, reliability, limitation, conclusion and improvement.
  4. D. GX22: Discuss Explain stabilising, directional and disruptive selection. without a null hypothesis, controlled variable or bias check. Evaluate validity, reliability, limitation, conclusion and improvement.

Answer

The correct answer is: GX22: Use the snail shell polymorphism. Measure banded-shell counts. Change predator-abundance index; record the dependent variable from the data table; hold shell key blind check constant. Use random/systematic sampling, representative sample size and bias check. Compare observed and expected values; use critical value, significance and null hypothesis. Correlation means association; correlation does not prove causation. Keep locus-variant evidence separate from allele-frequency model evidence and selection evidence. Evaluate validity, reliability, limitation, conclusion and improvement.

Explanation

A precise explanation should use the context, quote or interpret any evidence, and return to Explain stabilising, directional and disruptive selection. rather than giving a generic biology statement. GX22: The correct option is supported by banded-shell counts, predator-abundance index, controlled shell key blind check, representative sampling, observed and expected values, and a cautious correlation judgement. Evaluate validity, reliability, limitation, conclusion and improvement. For exam-style wording, develop the link between structure, function and consequence rather than stopping after a definition.

Common mistake

Evolution may lead to speciation common mistake 1

Giving a vague answer instead of directly addressing: Explain stabilising, directional and disruptive selection..

Answer by clearly explaining how to explain stabilising, directional and disruptive selection..

Related flashcards

Flashcard 1 of 5

Press Space to flip, arrows to move

Related practice questions

Question 1 of 5

Choose an answer, get feedback, then move sideways through the set.

0 of 4 attempted
stabilising, directional and disruptive… MCQ 4 | AQA A-Level Biology | ExamCompanion