logo

Question detail

Compare serialisation, timestamp ordering and commitment ordering as methods for controlling concurrent access to a client server database. Your answer should explain how each method can help preserve database integrity.

Try the question, check the answer, then read the explanation to understand the curriculum point.

At a glance

Question

Type

practice

Style

Topic

Client server databases

Exam-style question

Try this first

Compare serialisation, timestamp ordering and commitment ordering as methods for controlling concurrent access to a client server database. Your answer should explain how each method can help preserve database integrity.

Model answer

What a good answer should say

  • Serialisation makes concurrent operations follow a defined sequence, so their effects are applied in an ordered way rather than allowing conflicting operations to be applied unpredictably.
  • Timestamp ordering uses timestamps to establish the order in which operations should be processed.
  • Operations that do not follow the required timestamp order are controlled so that the agreed order is maintained.
  • Commitment ordering controls the order in which operations are committed, ensuring that the final acceptance of changes follows an appropriate order.

Explanation

Why this works

A strong comparison explains the controlling principle of each method: serialisation orders operations, timestamp ordering uses timestamps to order them, and commitment ordering controls the order of commitment. The answer also connects each method to preserving integrity during simultaneous access.

Common mistake

No common mistake is linked to this question yet.

Related flashcards

No flashcards are published for this page yet.

Related practice questions

No questions are published for this page yet.