Exam-style question
Try this first
Trade-off debate on 3.1.2.1 Consumer behaviour: which option best explains the economic mechanism in Individuals, firms, markets and market failure?.
- A.Use economic terminology such as demand, supply, elasticity, market failure, welfare, efficiency or policy trade-off instead of general business language.
- B.A tax shifts demand rather than affecting supply incentives and costs.
- C.Regulation is the same policy as a subsidy because both involve government.
- D.Give a definition of labour markets only, without application, chain of analysis, evaluation or judgement.
Model answer
What a good answer should say
- Correct answer: Use economic terminology such as demand, supply, elasticity, market failure, welfare, efficiency or policy trade-off instead of general business language..
- It is correct because it links 3.1.2.1 consumer behaviour to policy intervention and keeps the reasoning within the evidence supplied by the question.
Explanation
Why this works
The reasoning should move from cause to transmission mechanism to consequence. Use a diagram, calculation or data point if it is relevant, then test the answer with Economics evaluation: size of effect, time period, elasticity or responsiveness, assumptions, and distribution of gains and losses.
This keeps the response specific to Individual economic decision making rather than repeating a generic question template.
Common mistake
No common mistake is linked to this question yet.