Exam-style question
Try this first
MCQ focus 4 — sustained comparative argument across both texts. Which approach best demonstrates the required literary reasoning within Comparative argument for Build a sustained comparative argument across both texts?.
- A.Use AO4 to connect literary texts directly and AO5 to explore different evidence-supported interpretations.
- B.Use AO4 for spelling and AO5 for personal preference.
- C.Write two separate mini-essays for AO4 and add opinion for AO5.
- D.Treat context, comparison and interpretation as the same evidence.
Model answer
What a good answer should say
- The correct answer is Use AO4 to connect literary texts directly and AO5 to explore different evidence-supported interpretations.
Explanation
Why this works
The marked option is strongest because it answers the specific Comparative argument requirement through evidence-led literary reasoning. The distractors weaken the response by substituting summary, feature spotting, invented evidence, option mixing or unsupported opinion for analysis.
For Independent comparative critical study in Non-exam assessment Texts across time, the principal focus is AO1 argument and expression. To build a sustained comparative argument across both texts, the student must keep the answer anchored to the approved text or supplied passage and make each analytical step explicit.
Students write one extended comparative study of two texts on a theme of their choice. Keep the Comparative argument strand explicit so the reasoning cannot be transferred unchanged to another 7712 topic.
Check comparative NEA text eligibility, independence, authentication and the pre-1900 requirement before applying prepared material.
Common mistake
No common mistake is linked to this question yet.