Exam-style question
Try this first
Which interpretation should a candidate challenge when discussing different forms political participation — patterns and different forms of political participation? Use the relevant political concepts and evidence from Democracy and participation.
- A.an Act, convention, constitutional provision, ruling or institutional example linked to the comparison and its consequence for constitutional arrangements.
- B.A definition of constitutional arrangements with no UK-US application.
- C.A fact from another Politics component with no comparative link.
- D.A vague assertion that both countries work in the same way.
Model answer
What a good answer should say
- The correct answer is an Act, convention, constitutional provision, ruling or institutional example linked to the comparison and its consequence for constitutional arrangements.
Explanation
Why this works
an Act, convention, constitutional provision, ruling or institutional example linked to the comparison and its consequence for constitutional arrangements. This is correct because political evidence must connect an Act, convention, constitutional provision, ruling or institutional example to the stated UK-US claim.
Apply parliamentary sovereignty, codification, federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, conventions and judicial review precisely. the UK constitution is uncodified and retains parliamentary sovereignty, whereas the US Constitution is codified, federal and based on a formal separation of powers.
A structural viewpoint emphasises formal rules; however, a rational or cultural viewpoint may explain how actors use those rules. Overall, judge the evidence from an Act, convention, constitutional provision, ruling or institutional example and explain whether different constitutional rules alter institutional checks and accountability for "Analyse and evaluate patterns and different forms of political participation.".
Common mistake
No common mistake is linked to this question yet.