Exam-style question
Try this first
Which comparison most effectively evaluates their wider political contexts — the 1997 general election, one election before 1997 and one election since 1997 in their wider political contexts? Use the relevant political concepts and evidence from Elections and referendums.
- A.Define constitutional arrangements, compare the UK and USA through the UK constitution is uncodified and retains parliamentary sovereignty, whereas the US Constitution is codified, federal and based on a formal separation of powers, test evidence, then judge how far different constitutional rules alter institutional checks and accountability.
- B.Define constitutional arrangements, then write two separate country descriptions with no connection.
- C.Start with a judgement and omit the institutional evidence.
- D.Assume UK and US constitutional institutions are directly interchangeable and avoid evaluating the difference.
Model answer
What a good answer should say
- The correct answer is Define constitutional arrangements, compare the UK and USA through the UK constitution is uncodified and retains parliamentary sovereignty, whereas the US Constitution is codified, federal and based on a formal separation of powers, test evidence, then judge how far different constitutional rules alter institutional checks and accountability.
Explanation
Why this works
Define constitutional arrangements, compare the UK and USA through the UK constitution is uncodified and retains parliamentary sovereignty, whereas the US Constitution is codified, federal and based on a formal separation of powers, test evidence, then judge how far different constitutional rules alter institutional checks and accountability. This is correct because the structure links AO1 knowledge, AO2 comparison and AO3 judgement to constitutional arrangements.
Apply parliamentary sovereignty, codification, federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, conventions and judicial review precisely. the UK constitution is uncodified and retains parliamentary sovereignty, whereas the US Constitution is codified, federal and based on a formal separation of powers.
A structural viewpoint emphasises formal rules; however, a rational or cultural viewpoint may explain how actors use those rules. Overall, judge the evidence from an Act, convention, constitutional provision, ruling or institutional example and explain whether different constitutional rules alter institutional checks and accountability for "Analyse and evaluate the 1997 general election, one election before 1997 and one election since 1997 in their wider political contexts.".
Common mistake
No common mistake is linked to this question yet.