Which consequence follows most directly from representative assembly nationalist thinking — Jean-Jacques Rousseau's general will, popular sovereignty and opposition to representative assembly to nationalist thinking? Use the relevant political concepts and evidence from Nationalism optional route.

Reject the misconception that UK and US constitutional institutions are directly interchangeable; keep sovereignty and authority distinct and explain why the difference matters. This is correct because accurate Politics answers reject the misconception that UK and US constitutional institutions are directly interchangeable.

Apply parliamentary sovereignty, codification, federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, conventions and judicial review precisely. the UK constitution is uncodified and retains parliamentary sovereignty, whereas the US Constitution is codified, federal and based on a formal separation of powers.

A structural viewpoint emphasises formal rules; however, a rational or cultural viewpoint may explain how actors use those rules. Overall, judge the evidence from an Act, convention, constitutional provision, ruling or institutional example and explain whether different constitutional rules alter institutional checks and accountability for "Relate Jean-Jacques Rousseau's general will, popular sovereignty and opposition to representative assembly to nationalist thinking.".