Exam-style question
Try this first
How far does the evidence support parallels, connections, similarities differences — aspects of politics and political information, including in relation to parallels, connections, similarities and differences? Use the relevant political concepts and evidence from Assessment objectives.
- A.Define constitutional arrangements, compare the UK and USA through the UK constitution is uncodified and retains parliamentary sovereignty, whereas the US Constitution is codified, federal and based on a formal separation of powers, test evidence, then judge how far different constitutional rules alter institutional checks and accountability.
- B.Define constitutional arrangements, then write two separate country descriptions with no connection.
- C.Start with a judgement and omit the institutional evidence.
- D.Assume UK and US constitutional institutions are directly interchangeable and avoid evaluating the difference.
Model answer
What a good answer should say
- The correct answer is Define constitutional arrangements, compare the UK and USA through the UK constitution is uncodified and retains parliamentary sovereignty, whereas the US Constitution is codified, federal and based on a formal separation of powers, test evidence, then judge how far different constitutional rules alter institutional checks and accountability.
- The extract shows the meaning of the argument; therefore its implication should be stated before evaluation.
Explanation
Why this works
Define constitutional arrangements, compare the UK and USA through the UK constitution is uncodified and retains parliamentary sovereignty, whereas the US Constitution is codified, federal and based on a formal separation of powers, test evidence, then judge how far different constitutional rules alter institutional checks and accountability. This is correct because the structure links AO1 knowledge, AO2 comparison and AO3 judgement to constitutional arrangements.
Apply parliamentary sovereignty, codification, federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, conventions and judicial review precisely. the UK constitution is uncodified and retains parliamentary sovereignty, whereas the US Constitution is codified, federal and based on a formal separation of powers.
A structural viewpoint emphasises formal rules; however, a rational or cultural viewpoint may explain how actors use those rules. Overall, judge the evidence from an Act, convention, constitutional provision, ruling or institutional example and explain whether different constitutional rules alter institutional checks and accountability for "AO2 Analyse aspects of politics and political information, including in relation to parallels, connections, similarities and differences.".
This shows how the political information should be interpreted, and therefore why its implication matters for the conclusion.
Common mistake
No common mistake is linked to this question yet.