Exam-style question
Try this first
What is the strongest basis for judging substantiated judgements drawing conclusions — aspects of politics and political information, including constructing arguments, making substantiated judgements and drawing conclusions? Use the relevant political concepts and evidence from Assessment objectives.
- A.Reject the misconception that UK and US constitutional institutions are directly interchangeable; keep evaluation and unsupported opinion distinct and explain why the difference matters.
- B.Treat constitutional arrangements as identical in the UK and USA because both are democracies.
- C.Replace the institutional comparison with generic exam advice.
- D.Assume a shared label means the constitutional powers are the same.
Model answer
What a good answer should say
- The correct answer is Reject the misconception that UK and US constitutional institutions are directly interchangeable; keep evaluation and unsupported opinion distinct and explain why the difference matters.
- The extract shows the meaning of the argument; therefore its implication should be stated before evaluation.
Explanation
Why this works
Reject the misconception that UK and US constitutional institutions are directly interchangeable; keep evaluation and unsupported opinion distinct and explain why the difference matters. This is correct because accurate Politics answers reject the misconception that UK and US constitutional institutions are directly interchangeable.
Apply parliamentary sovereignty, codification, federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, conventions and judicial review precisely. the UK constitution is uncodified and retains parliamentary sovereignty, whereas the US Constitution is codified, federal and based on a formal separation of powers.
A structural viewpoint emphasises formal rules; however, a rational or cultural viewpoint may explain how actors use those rules. Overall, judge the evidence from an Act, convention, constitutional provision, ruling or institutional example and explain whether different constitutional rules alter institutional checks and accountability for "AO3 Evaluate aspects of politics and political information, including constructing arguments, making substantiated judgements and drawing conclusions.".
This shows how the political information should be interpreted, and therefore why its implication matters for the conclusion.
Common mistake
No common mistake is linked to this question yet.