logo

Question detail

Which option best protects the boundary between description and evaluation for Knowledge and understanding? (2)

Try the question, check the answer, then read the explanation to understand the curriculum point.

At a glance

MCQ

Type

practice

Style

Topic

Assessment objectives

Exam-style question

Try this first

Which option best protects the boundary between description and evaluation for Knowledge and understanding? (2).

  1. A.State the psychological concept first, then explain why supporting or challenging evidence changes the judgement.
  2. B.Treat correlation, experiment, explanation and treatment as identical forms of psychological reasoning.
  3. C.Write a general opinion about Assessment objectives without linking it to a concept, study, method or data pattern.
  4. D.List several topic words but do not explain what the evidence shows or why the judgement follows.

Model answer

What a good answer should say

  • Answer EO9WB for Ao1 Demonstrate Knowledge And: For Assessment Objectives, the answer is The correct answer is State the psychological concept first, then explain why supporting or challenging evidence changes the judgement..
  • It must be linked to AO1, Demonstrate, knowledge, understanding, scientific, ideas, processes, techniques rather than presented as a generic Psychology statement.

Explanation

Why this works

The safest route is to define the target idea, then apply it to the wording of the question. The answer is correct because it uses AO1 knowledge and understanding and keeps the focus on AO1 Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of scientific ideas, processes, techniques and procedures in Psychology..

Psychological reasoning: the response should name the mechanism or method, show how it operates, and use terms such as AO1, Demonstrate, knowledge, understanding, scientific, ideas, processes, techniques, procedures, Which, option, best. Evidence link: a named psychological study, model, method or application example can be used to support the point, but the answer should explain what the evidence demonstrates rather than simply naming it.

Evaluation: add a judgement about methodological control, ecological validity, population validity, ethics, determinism, reductionism, cultural bias or real-world application when that is relevant to the question. Exam relevance: the final sentence should make the answer explicit, so the examiner can see why the chosen point addresses the command word and not just the general topic.

Common mistake: avoid generic phrases such as "this is important"; explain the causal process, evidence quality or limitation in precise Psychology language.

Common mistake

No common mistake is linked to this question yet.

Related flashcards

No flashcards are published for this page yet.

Related practice questions

No questions are published for this page yet.