Question detail

What was one consequence of arranging elements strictly by atomic weight in early periodic tables?

Try the question, check the answer, then read the explanation to understand the curriculum point.

At a glance

Question

Type

exam_style

Style

Topic

The periodic table

Question

What was one consequence of arranging elements strictly by atomic weight in early periodic tables?

Answer

One consequence was that some elements were placed in groups that did not reflect their chemical properties, leading to inaccuracies in predicting their behavior. For example, elements with similar properties were sometimes separated due to their atomic weights.

Explanation

This answer is strong as it highlights the impact of strict atomic weight arrangements on the classification of elements, demonstrating an understanding of the relationship between atomic weight and chemical properties. The question tests the application of knowledge regarding the historical context of the periodic table.

Common mistake

Incomplete Early Tables

Students often state that early periodic tables were incomplete because they lacked certain elements without explaining the reason for the gaps.

Students should clarify that early periodic tables were incomplete because they did not account for the properties of elements that were not yet discovered, leading to gaps in the arrangement.

Related flashcards

Flashcard 1 of 5

Press Space to flip, arrows to move

Related practice questions

Question 1 of 5

Choose an answer, get feedback, then move sideways through the set.

0 of 5 attempted
exam Q2: why early periodic tables were… | The periodic table |… | ExamCompanion