Question detail

Correct a weak response to this AQA English Language objective: Explain how writer's methods make a statement convincing, partly convincing or limited.

Try the question, check the answer, then read the explanation to understand the curriculum point.

At a glance

Question

Type

exam_style

Style

Topic

Section A Reading fiction

Question

Correct a weak response to this AQA English Language objective: Explain how writer's methods make a statement convincing, partly convincing or limited.

Answer

Explain how writer's methods make response: A weak response usually summarises, guesses, or names a method without effect. Improve it by choosing evidence, explaining the effect, and linking the point to audience, purpose or writer purpose method. For Evaluating fiction, keep one clear focus, select brief evidence or a planned example, explain the method or writing choice, and link the point to effect, audience, purpose, form or tone where relevant.

Explanation

This is effective because it makes the mistake correction, evidence, explanation and assessment objective visible. Replace summary with a precise point, brief evidence, method, effect and writer purpose so the correction is exam-ready. Evaluating fiction should plan audience, purpose, form, tone, viewpoint, content and structure before drafting.

Common mistake

statement: summary instead of analysis

Students sometimes summarise Evaluating fiction instead of explaining how the objective works in the answer.

Correct this by selecting a brief detail, explaining its effect, and linking the point back to "Explain how writer's methods make a statement convincing, partly convincing or limited."

Related flashcards

Flashcard 1 of 5

Press Space to flip, arrows to move

Related practice questions

Question 1 of 5

Choose an answer, get feedback, then move sideways through the set.

0 of 5 attempted
exam Q1: convincing, partly convincing or… | Section A Reading… | ExamCompanion