Question 1
Question detail
Which judgement is best supported?
Try the question, check the answer, then read the explanation to understand the curriculum point.
At a glance
MCQ
Type
practice
Style
Topic
AC Russia, 1894-1945: Tsardom and communism
Question
- A. Nicholas II is significant when tied to 1905 Revolution.
- B. A broad opinion without context.
- C. A consequence described as a cause.
- D. An interpretation treated as factual evidence.
Answer
Chronology check: Nicholas II is significant when tied to 1905 Revolution. is the best answer. It fits Part one: The end of Tsardom within AC Russia, 1894-1945: Tsardom and communism and directly supports Study Nicholas II's autocracy and court, including revolutionary opposition, the 1905 Revolution, October Manifesto, reform attempts to 1914, Dumas, political stalemate and. Check this by using sequence, turning point, period, before, after, continuity, change; do not choose a distractor simply because it sounds historical.
Explanation
The correct option is Nicholas II is significant when tied. This MCQ is about Which judgement is best supported, not just general recall. The correct option works because it matches the period context of Paper 1 Section A: Period studies and uses the same evidence base as Study Nicholas II's autocracy and court, including revolutionary opposition, the 1905 Revolution, October Manifesto, reform attempts to 1914, Dumas, political stalemate and. The rejected options are weaker: 1) A broad opinion without context.; 2) A consequence described as a cause.; 3) An interpretation treated as factual evidence.. To decide between them, students should place, order, connect, contrast the option against chronology, evidence and the learning objective, then keep evidence separate from opinion and interpretation.
Common mistake
Avoid confusing Nicholas II
A common mistake is to write about Nicholas II as a general opinion, or to mix up cause, consequence, change and continuity in 1894-1945.
Anchor the answer to Part one: The end of Tsardom, use precise evidence, and state whether Nicholas II is a cause, consequence, change, continuity or significant development.
Related flashcards
Flashcard 1 of 5
Related practice questions
Question 1 of 5
Choose an answer, get feedback, then move sideways through the set.
