Question detail

Which answer uses evidence about Rhineland?

Try the question, check the answer, then read the explanation to understand the curriculum point.

At a glance

MCQ

Type

practice

Style

Topic

BB Conflict and tension: the inter-war years, 1918-1939

Question

  1. A. Rhineland is supported by evidence from Part three: The origins and....
  2. B. A statement that treats interpretation as a source.
  3. C. A vague point with no event or individual.
  4. D. A claim outside 1918-1939.

Answer

Rhineland is supported by evidence from Part three: The origins and.... is correct. Interpretation check: Rhineland is supported by evidence from Part three: The origins and. is the best answer. It fits Part three: The origins and outbreak of the Second World War within BB Conflict and tension: the inter-war years, 1918-1939 and directly supports Study escalation of tension, including Rhineland remilitarisation, Mussolini, the Axis, Anti-Comintern Pact, Anschluss, appeasement arguments, Sudeten Crisis, Munich and the ending of. Check this by using viewpoint, interpretation, source material, judgement, context, reliability; do not choose a distractor simply because it sounds historical.

Explanation

The correct option is Rhineland is supported by evidence from. This MCQ is about Which answer uses evidence about Rhineland, not just general recall. The correct option works because it matches the period context of Paper 1 Section B: Wider world depth studies and uses the same evidence base as Study escalation of tension, including Rhineland remilitarisation, Mussolini, the Axis, Anti-Comintern Pact, Anschluss, appeasement arguments, Sudeten Crisis, Munich and the ending of. The rejected options are weaker: 1) A statement that treats interpretation as a source.; 2) A vague point with no event or individual.; 3) A claim outside 1918-1939.. To decide between them, students should compare, evaluate, qualify, infer the option against chronology, evidence and the learning objective, then keep evidence separate from opinion and interpretation.

Common mistake

Avoid confusing Rhineland

A common mistake is to write about Rhineland as a general opinion, or to mix up cause, consequence, change and continuity in 1918-1939.

Anchor the answer to Part three: The origins and outbreak of the Second World War, use precise evidence, and state whether Rhineland is a cause, consequence, change, continuity or significant development.

Related flashcards

Flashcard 1 of 5

Press Space to flip, arrows to move

Related practice questions

Question 1 of 5

Choose an answer, get feedback, then move sideways through the set.

0 of 4 attempted
understanding MCQ 2: and the ending of appeasement. | BB Conflict… | ExamCompanion