Which option separates cause and consequence?

Evidence check: SALT 1 should be explained before judging consequences. is the best answer. It fits Part three: Transformation of the Cold War within BC Conflict and tension between East and West, 1945-1972 and directly supports Study easing of tension, including Soviet human-rights records, reasons for détente and SALT 1, and the roles of Brezhnev and Nixon. Check this by using evidence, provenance, date, event, individual, policy, consequence; do not choose a distractor simply because it sounds historical.

The correct option is SALT 1 should be explained before. This MCQ is about Which option separates cause and consequence, not just general recall. The correct option works because it matches the period context of Paper 1 Section B: Wider world depth studies and uses the same evidence base as Study easing of tension, including Soviet human-rights records, reasons for détente and SALT 1, and the roles of Brezhnev and Nixon. The rejected options are weaker: 1) A source comment with no provenance.; 2) A long-term cause treated as a result.; 3) A similarity presented as a difference.. To decide between them, students should identify, support, test, reject the option against chronology, evidence and the learning objective, then keep evidence separate from opinion and interpretation.