Question 1
Question detail
Which answer uses evidence about Vietnamisation?
Try the question, check the answer, then read the explanation to understand the curriculum point.
At a glance
MCQ
Type
practice
Style
Topic
BD Conflict and tension in Asia, 1950-1975
Question
- A. Vietnamisation is supported by evidence from Part three: The ending of....
- B. A statement that treats interpretation as a source.
- C. A vague point with no event or individual.
- D. A claim outside 1950-1975.
Answer
Vietnamisation is supported by evidence from Part three: The ending of.... is correct. Interpretation check: Vietnamisation is supported by evidence from Part three: The ending of. is the best answer. It fits Part three: The ending of conflict in Vietnam within BD Conflict and tension in Asia, 1950-1975 and directly supports Study Nixon's War, including Vietnamisation, chemical warfare, bombing from 1970 to 1972, relations with China and widening the war into Laos and. Check this by using viewpoint, interpretation, source material, judgement, context, reliability; do not choose a distractor simply because it sounds historical.
Explanation
The correct option is Vietnamisation is supported by evidence from. This MCQ is about Which answer uses evidence about Vietnamisation, not just general recall. The correct option works because it matches the period context of Paper 1 Section B: Wider world depth studies and uses the same evidence base as Study Nixon's War, including Vietnamisation, chemical warfare, bombing from 1970 to 1972, relations with China and widening the war into Laos and. The rejected options are weaker: 1) A statement that treats interpretation as a source.; 2) A vague point with no event or individual.; 3) A claim outside 1950-1975.. To decide between them, students should compare, evaluate, qualify, infer the option against chronology, evidence and the learning objective, then keep evidence separate from opinion and interpretation.
Common mistake
Avoid confusing Vietnamisation
A common mistake is to write about Vietnamisation as a general opinion, or to mix up cause, consequence, change and continuity in 1950-1975.
Anchor the answer to Part three: The ending of conflict in Vietnam, use precise evidence, and state whether Vietnamisation is a cause, consequence, change, continuity or significant development.
Related flashcards
Flashcard 1 of 5
Related practice questions
Question 1 of 5
Choose an answer, get feedback, then move sideways through the set.
