Which option separates cause and consequence?

Evidence check: judgement should be explained before judging consequences. is the best answer. It fits Wider world depth assessment requirements within Paper 1 Section B source-analysis requirements and directly supports Write an essay judgement using historical events, second-order concepts, substantiated reasoning and accurate spelling, punctuation, grammar and specialist terminology. Check this by using evidence, provenance, date, event, individual, policy, consequence; do not choose a distractor simply because it sounds historical.

The correct option is judgement should be explained before judging. This MCQ is about Which option separates cause and consequence, not just general recall. The correct option works because it matches the period context of Paper 1 Section B: Wider world depth studies and uses the same evidence base as Write an essay judgement using historical events, second-order concepts, substantiated reasoning and accurate spelling, punctuation, grammar and specialist terminology. The rejected options are weaker: 1) A source comment with no provenance.; 2) A long-term cause treated as a result.; 3) A similarity presented as a difference.. To decide between them, students should identify, support, test, reject the option against chronology, evidence and the learning objective, then keep evidence separate from opinion and interpretation.