Which option separates cause and consequence?

Evidence check: Great Reform Act should be explained before judging consequences. is the best answer. It fits Part three: Reform and reformers within BB Britain: Power and the people: c1170 to the present day and directly supports Study extension of the franchise, including radical protest, causes and impact of the Great Reform Act, further reform and Chartism's causes, actions. Check this by using evidence, provenance, date, event, individual, policy, consequence; do not choose a distractor simply because it sounds historical.

This MCQ is about Which option separates cause and consequence, not just general recall. The correct option works because it matches the period context of Paper 2 Section A: Thematic studies and uses the same evidence base as Study extension of the franchise, including radical protest, causes and impact of the Great Reform Act, further reform and Chartism's causes, actions. The rejected options are weaker: 1) A source comment with no provenance.; 2) A long-term cause treated as a result.; 3) A similarity presented as a difference.. To decide between them, students should identify, support, test, reject the option against chronology, evidence and the learning objective, then keep evidence separate from opinion and interpretation.