Which option separates cause and consequence?

Evidence check: Hundred Rolls should be explained before judging consequences. is the best answer. It fits Part one: Government, the rights of King and people within BB Medieval England: the reign of Edward I, 1272-1307 and directly supports Study development of government, rights and justice, including Hundred Rolls, Robert Burnell, Statutes of Westminster, Statutes of Mortmain, Quo Warranto Inquiries, parliaments. Check this by using evidence, provenance, date, event, individual, policy, consequence; do not choose a distractor simply because it sounds historical.

The correct option is Hundred Rolls should be explained before. This MCQ is about Which option separates cause and consequence, not just general recall. The correct option works because it matches the period context of Paper 2 Section B: British depth studies including the historic environment and uses the same evidence base as Study development of government, rights and justice, including Hundred Rolls, Robert Burnell, Statutes of Westminster, Statutes of Mortmain, Quo Warranto Inquiries, parliaments. The rejected options are weaker: 1) A source comment with no provenance.; 2) A long-term cause treated as a result.; 3) A similarity presented as a difference.. To decide between them, students should identify, support, test, reject the option against chronology, evidence and the learning objective, then keep evidence separate from opinion and interpretation.