Question detail

What is a potential benefit of using isotopes with very short half-lives in medical treatments?

Try the question, check the answer, then read the explanation to understand the curriculum point.

At a glance

MCQ

Type

practice

Style

Topic

Hazards and uses of radioactive emissions and of background radiation

Question

  1. A. They minimize radiation exposure to patients.
  2. B. They are easier to handle and store.
  3. C. They provide a constant source of radiation.
  4. D. They are more effective for long-term treatments.

Answer

The correct answer is A: They minimize radiation exposure to patients..

Explanation

The correct answer is A: They minimize radiation exposure to patients.. This supports the learning objective "Explain why a very short half-life may make a source difficult to use." in Different half-lives of radioactive isotopes because it uses the correct atomic and nuclear radiation relationship for Hazards and uses of radioactive emissions and of background radiation. The other options are less suitable because they do not match the required Different half-lives of radioactive isotopes idea: They are easier to handle and store.; They provide a constant source of radiation.; They are more effective for long-term treatments..

Common mistake

Short Half-Life Misunderstanding

Students often think that a very short half-life means the radioactive source is always safe to use because it decays quickly.

Emphasize that a very short half-life can lead to rapid decay, making it difficult to detect and use effectively, as the source may not remain active long enough for the intended application.

Related flashcards

Flashcard 1 of 5

Press Space to flip, arrows to move

Related practice questions

Question 1 of 5

Choose an answer, get feedback, then move sideways through the set.

0 of 4 attempted
understanding MCQ 4: a source difficult to use. | Hazards and uses… | ExamCompanion