Exam-style question
Try this first
Which comparison most effectively evaluates example 1945-1997 1997 present — two examples demonstrating the power of the Prime Minister and cabinet to dictate events and determine policy making, including one example from 1945-1997 and one from 1997 to the present? Use the relevant political concepts and evidence from The Prime Minister and cabinet.
- A.the UK Prime Minister normally leads the parliamentary majority, whereas the US President is separately elected and operates within a formal separation of powers; this matters because different executive-legislative relationships alter appointment, policy and scrutiny powers.
- B.The UK and USA have identical structures for executive power and accountability.
- C.Only political culture matters, so institutions can be ignored when comparing executive power and accountability.
- D.Describe the UK and USA separately without identifying a similarity, difference or consequence.
Model answer
What a good answer should say
- The correct answer is the UK Prime Minister normally leads the parliamentary majority, whereas the US President is separately elected and operates within a formal separation of powers; this matters because different executive-legislative relationships alter appointment, policy and scrutiny powers.
Explanation
Why this works
the UK Prime Minister normally leads the parliamentary majority, whereas the US President is separately elected and operates within a formal separation of powers; this matters because different executive-legislative relationships alter appointment, policy and scrutiny powers. This is correct because AO2 requires an explicit institutional comparison and explains that different executive-legislative relationships alter appointment, policy and scrutiny powers.
Apply cabinet responsibility, party majority, executive orders, congressional checks, appointments, impeachment and legislative scrutiny precisely. the UK Prime Minister normally leads the parliamentary majority, whereas the US President is separately elected and operates within a formal separation of powers.
A structural viewpoint emphasises formal rules; however, a rational or cultural viewpoint may explain how actors use those rules. Overall, judge the evidence from a legislative vote, executive order, ministerial convention, appointment or scrutiny example and explain whether different executive-legislative relationships alter appointment, policy and scrutiny powers for "Analyse and evaluate two examples demonstrating the power of the Prime Minister and cabinet to dictate events and determine policy making, including one example from 1945-1997 and one from 1997 to the present.".
Common mistake
No common mistake is linked to this question yet.