Exam-style question
Try this first
What distinction should frame an answer about bases powers Supreme Courts — the relative extent and constitutional bases of the powers of the UK and US Supreme Courts? Use the relevant political concepts and evidence from The judiciaries.
- A.AO1 knowledge, AO2 analysis or comparison, then AO3 evaluation and an evidence-based judgement where required.
- B.Conclusion first, followed by disconnected definitions.
- C.Two separate descriptions presented as comparison.
- D.A personal preference with no constitutional or ideological evidence.
Model answer
What a good answer should say
- The correct answer is AO1 knowledge, AO2 analysis or comparison, then AO3 evaluation and an evidence-based judgement where required.
Explanation
Why this works
AO1 knowledge, AO2 analysis or comparison, then AO3 evaluation and an evidence-based judgement where required. This is correct because the structure keeps knowledge, analysis and evaluation distinct while linking them to the approved objective.
The UK and USA may perform a related political function, whereas their constitutional structures differ; the comparison matters because it changes power and accountability. One viewpoint supports the stated approach.
However, a competing viewpoint may be stronger in another context. Overall, AO3 judgement must follow from political evidence rather than assertion when answering "Analyse and evaluate the relative extent and constitutional bases of the powers of the UK and US Supreme Courts.".
Common mistake
No common mistake is linked to this question yet.