Exam-style question
Try this first
How should the argument about their accountability their legislatures — the roles and powers of the UK Prime Minister and US President, how they differ and the extent of their accountability to their legislatures? Use the relevant political concepts and evidence from The executives.
- A.Keep UK and US institutions, and comparison rather than separate description distinct and explain the political significance of the distinction.
- B.Treat the neighbouring concepts as interchangeable.
- C.Use a generic revision technique instead of political reasoning.
- D.Move to a different optional route without identifying the change.
Model answer
What a good answer should say
- The correct answer is Keep UK and US institutions, and comparison rather than separate description distinct and explain the political significance of the distinction.
Explanation
Why this works
Keep UK and US institutions, and comparison rather than separate description distinct and explain the political significance of the distinction. This is correct because accurate Politics answers protect the boundary between UK and US institutions, and comparison rather than separate description.
The UK and USA may perform a related political function, whereas their constitutional structures differ; the comparison matters because it changes power and accountability. One viewpoint supports the stated approach.
However, a competing viewpoint may be stronger in another context. Overall, AO3 judgement must follow from political evidence rather than assertion when answering "Analyse and evaluate the roles and powers of the UK Prime Minister and US President, how they differ and the extent of their accountability to their legislatures.".
Common mistake
No common mistake is linked to this question yet.