Exam-style question
Try this first
Which consequence follows most directly from their accountability their legislatures — the roles and powers of the UK Prime Minister and US President, how they differ and the extent of their accountability to their legislatures? Use the relevant political concepts and evidence from The executives.
- A.A relevant election, ruling, Act, convention, institutional example, prescribed thinker or extract argument explained in context.
- B.An unsupported claim that sounds plausible.
- C.A fact from another subject with no political link.
- D.A vague reference to what everyone believes.
Model answer
What a good answer should say
- The correct answer is A relevant election, ruling, Act, convention, institutional example, prescribed thinker or extract argument explained in context.
Explanation
Why this works
A relevant election, ruling, Act, convention, institutional example, prescribed thinker or extract argument explained in context. This is correct because political evidence must be precise, relevant and connected to the claim.
The UK and USA may perform a related political function, whereas their constitutional structures differ; the comparison matters because it changes power and accountability. One viewpoint supports the stated approach.
However, a competing viewpoint may be stronger in another context. Overall, AO3 judgement must follow from political evidence rather than assertion when answering "Analyse and evaluate the roles and powers of the UK Prime Minister and US President, how they differ and the extent of their accountability to their legislatures.".
Common mistake
No common mistake is linked to this question yet.