Exam-style question
Try this first
Which consequence follows most directly from third-party independent candidates — third-party and independent candidates in the UK and USA? Use the relevant political concepts and evidence from Electoral and party systems.
- A.A relevant election, ruling, Act, convention, institutional example, prescribed thinker or extract argument explained in context.
- B.An unsupported claim that sounds plausible.
- C.A fact from another subject with no political link.
- D.A vague reference to what everyone believes.
Model answer
What a good answer should say
- The correct answer is A relevant election, ruling, Act, convention, institutional example, prescribed thinker or extract argument explained in context.
Explanation
Why this works
A relevant election, ruling, Act, convention, institutional example, prescribed thinker or extract argument explained in context. This is correct because political evidence must be precise, relevant and connected to the claim.
The UK and USA may perform a related political function, whereas their constitutional structures differ; the comparison matters because it changes power and accountability. One viewpoint supports the stated approach.
However, a competing viewpoint may be stronger in another context. Overall, AO3 judgement must follow from political evidence rather than assertion when answering "Analyse and evaluate third-party and independent candidates in the UK and USA.".
Common mistake
No common mistake is linked to this question yet.