Exam-style question
Try this first
What evidence would allow a candidate to assess third-party independent candidates — third-party and independent candidates in the UK and USA? Use the relevant political concepts and evidence from Electoral and party systems.
- A.AO1 knowledge, AO2 analysis or comparison, then AO3 evaluation and an evidence-based judgement where required.
- B.Conclusion first, followed by disconnected definitions.
- C.Two separate descriptions presented as comparison.
- D.A personal preference with no constitutional or ideological evidence.
Model answer
What a good answer should say
- The correct answer is AO1 knowledge, AO2 analysis or comparison, then AO3 evaluation and an evidence-based judgement where required.
Explanation
Why this works
AO1 knowledge, AO2 analysis or comparison, then AO3 evaluation and an evidence-based judgement where required. This is correct because the structure keeps knowledge, analysis and evaluation distinct while linking them to the approved objective.
The UK and USA may perform a related political function, whereas their constitutional structures differ; the comparison matters because it changes power and accountability. One viewpoint supports the stated approach.
However, a competing viewpoint may be stronger in another context. Overall, AO3 judgement must follow from political evidence rather than assertion when answering "Analyse and evaluate third-party and independent candidates in the UK and USA.".
Common mistake
No common mistake is linked to this question yet.