Exam-style question
Try this first
Which consequence follows most directly from judges Court's current composition — the process of selecting and appointing Supreme Court judges and the Court's current composition? Use the relevant political concepts and evidence from The judicial branch of government.
- A.a named ruling, appointment process, constitutional provision or institutional conflict linked to the comparison and its consequence for judicial power and independence.
- B.A definition of judicial power and independence with no UK-US application.
- C.A fact from another Politics component with no comparative link.
- D.A vague assertion that both countries work in the same way.
Model answer
What a good answer should say
- The correct answer is a named ruling, appointment process, constitutional provision or institutional conflict linked to the comparison and its consequence for judicial power and independence.
Explanation
Why this works
a named ruling, appointment process, constitutional provision or institutional conflict linked to the comparison and its consequence for judicial power and independence. This is correct because political evidence must connect a named ruling, appointment process, constitutional provision or institutional conflict to the stated UK-US claim.
Apply judicial review, parliamentary sovereignty, constitutional supremacy, appointments, tenure, precedent and rights adjudication precisely. the UK Supreme Court interprets law within parliamentary sovereignty, whereas the US Supreme Court can invalidate legislation that conflicts with the codified Constitution.
A structural viewpoint emphasises formal rules; however, a rational or cultural viewpoint may explain how actors use those rules. Overall, judge the evidence from a named ruling, appointment process, constitutional provision or institutional conflict and explain whether constitutional foundations alter judicial power, appointments and political impact for "Analyse and evaluate the process of selecting and appointing Supreme Court judges and the Court's current composition.".
Common mistake
No common mistake is linked to this question yet.