Question detail

For Section A Reading non-fiction and literary non-fiction, which option best applies inference from evidence to this objective: Avoid treating each source separately when the task requires comparison.

Try the question, check the answer, then read the explanation to understand the curriculum point.

At a glance

MCQ

Type

practice

Style

Topic

Section A Reading non-fiction and literary non-fiction

Question

  1. A. Select a brief phrase, infer the implied meaning, then explain how the evidence supports it for Avoid treating each source separately
  2. B. Copy a long section without interpreting the implication in Comparing writers' methods and perspectives
  3. C. Guess an idea without using evidence for Avoid treating each source separately
  4. D. Retell the events instead of explaining the meaning in Section A Reading non-fiction and literary non-fiction

Answer

Avoid treating each source separately answer: Select a brief phrase, infer the implied meaning, then explain how the evidence supports it for Avoid treating each source separately.

Explanation

Avoid treating each source separately uses Select a brief phrase, infer the implied meaning, then explain how the evidence supports it for Avoid treating each source separately because it matches the inference from evidence focus for Comparing writers' methods and perspectives. It separates the skill from weaker choices and keeps the response tied to the exact objective. Use AO1: select one brief phrase, infer the implicit meaning, and explain how the evidence proves the point for Comparing writers' methods and perspectives. Section A Reading non-fiction and literary non-fiction should compare both sources by naming similar and different ideas rather than treating them separately. Comparing writers' methods and perspectives should plan audience, purpose, form, tone, viewpoint, content and structure before drafting.

Common mistake

comparison: summary instead of analysis

Students sometimes summarise Comparing writers' methods and perspectives instead of explaining how the objective works in the answer.

Correct this by selecting a brief detail, explaining its effect, and linking the point back to "Avoid treating each source separately when the task requires comparison."

Related flashcards

Flashcard 1 of 5

Press Space to flip, arrows to move

Related practice questions

Question 1 of 5

Choose an answer, get feedback, then move sideways through the set.

0 of 4 attempted
recall MCQ 1: when the task requires comparison. | Section A… | ExamCompanion