Question detail

For Section A Reading non-fiction and literary non-fiction, which option best applies language method and reader effect to this objective: Support comparisons with concise evidence from both texts.

Try the question, check the answer, then read the explanation to understand the curriculum point.

At a glance

MCQ

Type

practice

Style

Topic

Section A Reading non-fiction and literary non-fiction

Question

  1. A. Identify word choice or imagery, explain the reader effect, and link it to writer purpose for Support comparisons with concise evidence
  2. B. Name a technique without explaining its effect in Summarising differences and similarities
  3. C. Discuss paragraph order instead of language choice for Support comparisons with concise evidence
  4. D. Give a personal reaction without textual support in Section A Reading non-fiction and literary non-fiction

Answer

Support comparisons with concise evidence answer: Identify word choice or imagery, explain the reader effect, and link it to writer purpose for Support comparisons with concise evidence.

Explanation

Support comparisons with concise evidence uses Identify word choice or imagery, explain the reader effect, and link it to writer purpose for Support comparisons with concise evidence because it matches the language method and reader effect focus for Summarising differences and similarities. It separates the skill from weaker choices and keeps the response tied to the exact objective. Use AO2: name the language method, such as word choice or imagery, then explain the reader effect and writer purpose. Support comparisons with concise evidence from should use brief evidence and explain what that evidence implies, so the inference is not just explicit summary. Section A Reading non-fiction and literary non-fiction should compare both sources by naming similar and different ideas rather than treating them separately. Summarising differences and similarities should plan audience, purpose, form, tone, viewpoint, content and structure before drafting.

Common mistake

comparison: summary instead of analysis

Students sometimes summarise Summarising differences and similarities instead of explaining how the objective works in the answer.

Correct this by selecting a brief detail, explaining its effect, and linking the point back to "Support comparisons with concise evidence from both texts."

Related flashcards

Flashcard 1 of 5

Press Space to flip, arrows to move

Related practice questions

Question 1 of 5

Choose an answer, get feedback, then move sideways through the set.

0 of 4 attempted
understanding MCQ 2: concise evidence from both texts. | Section A… | ExamCompanion