Question detail

For Section A Reading non-fiction and literary non-fiction, which option best applies structural development to this objective: Support comparisons with concise evidence from both texts.

Try the question, check the answer, then read the explanation to understand the curriculum point.

Show answer Topic hub Objective page

At a glance

MCQ

Type

practice

Style

Topic

Section A Reading non-fiction and literary non-fiction

Question

A. Track the opening, shift, focus or ending and explain how the structure guides the reader for Support comparisons with concise evidence
B. Treat structure as a single adjective in Summarising differences and similarities
C. Ignore sequence, pace and paragraph focus for Support comparisons with concise evidence
D. Only describe what happens in the text in Section A Reading non-fiction and literary non-fiction

Answer

Support comparisons with concise evidence answer: Track the opening, shift, focus or ending and explain how the structure guides the reader for Support comparisons with concise evidence.

Explanation

Support comparisons with concise evidence uses Track the opening, shift, focus or ending and explain how the structure guides the reader for Support comparisons with concise evidence because it matches the structural development focus for Summarising differences and similarities. It separates the skill from weaker choices and keeps the response tied to the exact objective. Use AO2 structure: track focus, opening, ending, shift, pace or sequence, then explain how the reader is guided through the text. Support comparisons with concise evidence from should use brief evidence and explain what that evidence implies, so the inference is not just explicit summary. Section A Reading non-fiction and literary non-fiction should compare both sources by naming similar and different ideas rather than treating them separately. Summarising differences and similarities should plan audience, purpose, form, tone, viewpoint, content and structure before drafting.

Common mistake

comparison: summary instead of analysis

Students sometimes summarise Summarising differences and similarities instead of explaining how the objective works in the answer.

Correct this by selecting a brief detail, explaining its effect, and linking the point back to "Support comparisons with concise evidence from both texts."

Related flashcards

Flashcard 1 of 5

Press Space to flip, arrows to move

For Section A Reading non-fiction and literary non-fiction, which option best applies inference from evidence to this objective: Support comparisons with concise evidence from both texts.