Which option separates cause and consequence?

Evidence check: Black Power should be explained before judging consequences. is the best answer. It fits Part three: Post-war America within AD America, 1920-1973: Opportunity and inequality and directly supports Study racial tension and Civil Rights campaigns in the 1950s and 1960s, including segregation laws, Martin Luther King, peaceful protest, Malcolm X,. Check this by using evidence, provenance, date, event, individual, policy, consequence; do not choose a distractor simply because it sounds historical.

The correct option is Black Power should be explained before. This MCQ is about Which option separates cause and consequence, not just general recall. The correct option works because it matches the period context of Paper 1 Section A: Period studies and uses the same evidence base as Study racial tension and Civil Rights campaigns in the 1950s and 1960s, including segregation laws, Martin Luther King, peaceful protest, Malcolm X,. The rejected options are weaker: 1) A source comment with no provenance.; 2) A long-term cause treated as a result.; 3) A similarity presented as a difference.. To decide between them, students should identify, support, test, reject the option against chronology, evidence and the learning objective, then keep evidence separate from opinion and interpretation.