Study resource

BA Conflict and tension: the First World War, 1894-1918 study guide

Use these study guide for BA Conflict and tension: the First World War, 1894-1918 in AQA History 8145. The page is built from approved learning objectives for this topic and links back to the wider unit, topic hub, and related revision assets.

At a glance

study guide

Resource type

Topic

BA Conflict and tension: the First World War, 1894-1918

AQAGCSEHistoryPaper 1 Section B: Wider world depth studies

Study guide overview

  • BA Conflict and tension: the First World War, 1894-1918 study guide

    Revise BA Conflict and tension: the First World War, 1894-1918 for AQA GCSE History 8145 with chronology, context, evidence, causes, consequences, significance and exam focus.

    BA Conflict and tension: the First World War, 1894-1918

    Timeline BA Conflict and tension: the First World War, 1894-1918 belongs within Paper 1 Section B: Wider world depth studies for AQA GCSE History 8145. The period focus is 1894-1918. Students should place the named events and developments in chronological order before making a judgement. The central curriculum points include Triple Alliance, Weltpolitik, Sarajevo, Schlieffen Plan, Verdun.

    Key Individuals Key people, groups and developments should be connected to the approved learning objectives rather than treated as isolated facts. The Alliance System, including the Triple Alliance, Franco-Russian Alliance, Entente relations, Moroccan crises and Balkan crises and their effects on international relations. Anglo-German rivalry, including Britain's challenge to Splendid Isolation, Kaiser Wilhelm's foreign policy aims, Weltpolitik, colonial tensions, European rearmament and the Anglo-German naval race. The outbreak of war, including Slav nationalism, Serbia and Austria-Hungary, Sarajevo assassination, July Crisis, Schlieffen Plan, Belgium and reasons for the escalation of conflict. The Schlieffen Plan, including reasons for the plan, its failure, the Battle of the Marne and its contribution to stalemate. These points help students choose precise evidence for short-answer, narrative and essay questions.

    Historical Evidence Causal explanation should separate long-term conditions from short-term triggers. Evidence should be named, dated where possible, and linked directly to the claim being made. In this topic, useful evidence comes from the specified events, periods, individuals and groups in the source curriculum.

    Interpretations Consequences should be explained as outcomes of events or developments, not confused with causes. Interpretations should be compared by identifying what each interpretation claims, why it may differ, and how contextual knowledge supports or challenges it.

    Concept Boundaries Significance is more than importance. It asks why an event, person or development mattered at the time and over time. Keep source and interpretation, causation and consequence, change and continuity, similarity and difference, and evidence and opinion clearly separated.

    Examination Strategy In exam answers, start with the command word, select precise historical evidence, and keep the response anchored to the selected route. Use chronology where it clarifies the argument. For extended responses, make a judgement and support each paragraph with evidence. Revision focus 1: The Alliance System, including the Triple Alliance, Franco-Russian Alliance, Entente relations, Moroccan crises and Balkan crises and their effects on international relations. Anchor this point to Part one: The causes of the First World War, use specific evidence, and explain whether it is best used for context, cause, consequence, change, continuity, significance, source utility or interpretation evaluation. Revision focus 2: Anglo-German rivalry, including Britain's challenge to Splendid Isolation, Kaiser Wilhelm's foreign policy aims, Weltpolitik, colonial tensions, European rearmament and the Anglo-German naval race. Anchor this point to Part one: The causes of the First World War, use specific evidence, and explain whether it is best used for context, cause, consequence, change, continuity, significance, source utility or interpretation evaluation. Revision focus 3: The outbreak of war, including Slav nationalism, Serbia and Austria-Hungary, Sarajevo assassination, July Crisis, Schlieffen Plan, Belgium and reasons for the escalation of conflict. Anchor this point to Part one: The causes of the First World War, use specific evidence, and explain whether it is best used for context, cause, consequence, change, continuity, significance, source utility or interpretation evaluation. Revision focus 4: The Schlieffen Plan, including reasons for the plan, its failure, the Battle of the Marne and its contribution to stalemate. Anchor this point to Part two: The First World War: stalemate, use specific evidence, and explain whether it is best used for context, cause, consequence, change, continuity, significance, source utility or interpretation evaluation. Revision focus 5: The Western Front, including military tactics, technology, trench warfare, attrition, Verdun, the Somme and Passchendaele, and the reasons, events and significance of these battles. Anchor this point to Part two: The First World War: stalemate, use specific evidence, and explain whether it is best used for context, cause, consequence, change, continuity, significance, source utility or interpretation evaluation. Revision focus 6: The wider war, including other fronts, Gallipoli and its failure, and the events and significance of the war at sea including Jutland, U-Boats and convoys. Anchor this point to Part two: The First World War: stalemate, use specific evidence, and explain whether it is best used for context, cause, consequence, change, continuity, significance, source utility or interpretation evaluation. Revision focus 7: Changes in the Allied forces, including consequences of the Bolshevik Revolution and Russia's withdrawal for German strategy and the reasons for and impact of USA entry. Anchor this point to Part three: Ending the war, use specific evidence, and explain whether it is best used for context, cause, consequence, change, continuity, significance, source utility or interpretation evaluation. Revision focus 8: Military developments in 1918 and their contribution to Germany's defeat, including tactical and technological evolution, Ludendorff's Spring Offensive and the Allied advance during the Hundred Days. Anchor this point to Part three: Ending the war, use specific evidence, and explain whether it is best used for context, cause, consequence, change, continuity, significance, source utility or interpretation evaluation.

Ready to practise?

Choose your next step

Use the study guide for understanding, then switch into an active revision mode.

BA Conflict and tension: the First World War, 1894-1918 study… | ExamCompanion