Option 2 exam tips

Exam tips

• Structure your answer with PEEL

  When writing about symptoms, start with a point, provide evidence (e.g., examples of hallucinations), explain how it illustrates the point, and link back to the question.

  PEEL keeps answers focused, shows understanding, and meets the assessment demand for analysis and evaluation.

• Use the term 'negative symptom' correctly

  When answering, first state that negative symptoms are deficits, then give examples such as speech poverty and avolition.

  This demonstrates understanding of the definition and helps structure the answer.

• Structure your diagnosis‑related answers

  Use clear subheadings for co‑morbidity, culture bias, gender bias, and symptom overlap. Under each, give a concise definition, an example, and a brief discussion of its impact on diagnosis.

  A structured format helps you cover all required points efficiently and demonstrates a systematic understanding of the topic.

• Use cautious language with contested evidence

  When describing genetic or neural findings, note that most studies are correlational and that causality cannot be definitively established.

  This approach prevents over‑statement, aligns with the specification’s emphasis on cautious interpretation, and demonstrates critical thinking.

• Structure your answer clearly

  Begin with a brief definition, then describe the key components, provide evidence, and conclude with a balanced view. Use subheadings or bullet points where appropriate to organise information.

  Clear structure helps examiners follow your argument and demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of the topic.

• Use the PEST structure for extended responses

  Plan, Evidence, Strengths, Limitations, Theory – this framework ensures you cover all assessment demands and present a balanced argument.

  PEST helps organise your answer, making it easier to include key points, evidence, and critical evaluation within the time limit.

• Structure your answer clearly

  Begin with a brief definition, then explain mechanisms, provide evidence, and conclude with limitations or future directions.

  A clear structure demonstrates understanding and helps examiners follow your argument, improving your marks.

• Integrate examples in your answers

  When discussing the interactionist approach or diathesis-stress model, include specific examples to illustrate your points.

  Providing examples helps to clarify your understanding and demonstrates the application of theoretical concepts.

• Use examples to illustrate points

  When discussing concepts like taste aversion or social influences, include specific examples to strengthen your argument.

  Examples help to clarify your understanding and demonstrate the application of psychological concepts.

• Use clear definitions

  When explaining hormones, provide clear definitions and their roles in eating behaviour.

  This demonstrates your understanding and helps to clarify complex concepts.